How Much Should We Depend On The Stock Market?

Simple
analyses, which look to historical returns as estimates for what retirees
should expect in the future, tend to provide an incomplete picture that may
overstate the potential for stocks relative to other strategies. We will
investigate some of the adjustments that should be made to historical returns
to obtain a better idea about the net returns from an investment portfolio on a
forward-looking basis. These include accounting for the impacts of volatility
on compounded returns, inflation, investment fees, investor behavior, asset
allocation, and taxes.

We
can also identify stock returns as the sum of inflation, real bond yields, and
an equity premium, and we can look to what are reasonable values at the present
for these building blocks. Another important matter is to incorporate the idea
that most financial planning involves seeking a high probability of success,
which requires assuming below average returns, and the necessary reduction to
return assumptions is greater when distributions are taken.

While
a risk premium must be expected in order to induce investors to position their
assets into more volatile investments, there is no reason to necessarily
believe that historical excess returns provide the best predictors about the
future risk premium. Also, it may take longer than anticipated for returns on
stocks to outpace bonds, and retirees who are taking distributions become more
vulnerable to this waiting game.

All
too often, it seems that examples about retirement planning are based on
assumptions that investments will grow at a fixed 8 percent or even 12 percent.
While not impossible, the reality is that such return assumptions are overly
optimistic, especially for those approaching retirement.

For additional information, click here to download our resource, 5 Ways You’re Sabotaging Your Retirement Income Plan.

For
a lifetime financial plan, the most intuitive way to express a portfolio return
assumption is as an inflation-adjusted compounding return. Unfortunately, this
is not the most common way returns are expressed. It is more typical to see
returns expressed in nominal terms and even as arithmetic numbers that
incorrectly reflect long-term growth rates. As well, to understand potential
purchasing power, we should make further adjustments for taxes, fees, investor
behavior, and asset allocation. A quick review is in order for the steps needed
to arrive at a net real compounded return for a portfolio, as well as other
adjustments that may be needed to create a properly conservative portfolio
return assumption.

Exhibit 1.1 Return Characteristics by Asset Allocation as Based on US Financial Market Nominal Annual Returns, 1926–2018

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description automatically generated

Source: Own
calculations from SBBI Yearbook data
provided by Morningstar and Ibbotson
Associates. Stocks are represented by the large-capitalization US stocks and
bonds by intermediate term US government bonds.

Exhibit
1.1 shows the historical returns for different asset allocations for portfolios
consisting of different combinations of the S&P 500 and intermediate term US
government bonds (ITGB). As described with the earlier discussion of Summary Statistics for US Financial Market Annual
Returns and Inflation
,
for the period since 1926, Morningstar data reveals that the S&P 500
enjoyed an average (arithmetic) return of 11.9 percent, while intermediate-term
government bonds earned 5.2 percent.

Volatility

When
simulating long-term financial plans, we also have to account for volatility
and the lack of symmetry in outcomes for positive and negative returns, as
discussed. We calculate the compounded returns over time to account for this
volatility. The S&P 500 compounded return fell to 10 percent, while the
compounded return for the less volatile bonds fell only slightly to 5.1
percent. These compounded returns express the growth rate for a portfolio over
longer periods, while the larger arithmetic average returns represent the
average return only for a single year.

At
least one popular radio host likes to imply that his listeners’ stock
portfolios will grow at 12 percent, but this is a misunderstanding on his part.
It is the compounded return, not the arithmetic return, that matters for the
long-run growth of a portfolio.

This is an excerpt from Wade Pfau’s book, Safety-First Retirement Planning: An Integrated Approach for a Worry-Free Retirement. (The Retirement Researcher’s Guide Series), available now on Amazon.

 


Originally posted at https://retirementresearcher.com/how-much-should-we-depend-on-the-stock-market/

→ Save time. Save paperwork. Save dollars. Esurance ←